Re^4: RFC: Tutorial "Introspecting your Moose code using Test Point Callbacks"

in reply to Re^3: RFC: Tutorial "Introspecting your Moose code using Test Point Callbacks"
in thread RFC: Tutorial "Introspecting your Moose code using Test Point Callbacks"

Thanks again for your valuable input. I will definitely consider your functor recommendation. Regarding the use of callbacks to test or diagnose specific spots inside a function, do you see any situation where it can be useful? Or do you consider that it always boils down to a design or refactoring issue? Lastly, did my comments on these sub-tests as a way to diagnose a failed test make any sense?

Comment on Re^4: RFC: Tutorial "Introspecting your Moose code using Test Point Callbacks"

In Section Meditations