Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re: Can we have C-style Modularity?

by thezip (Vicar)
on Jan 20, 2011 at 03:57 UTC ( #883234=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Can we have C-style Modularity?

I often write modules just so that I don't have to look at subroutine code anymore. By giving my module subroutines descriptive names and reasonable interfaces, I can abstract the subs to do very useful things without having to worry about the details therein.

I'm a big fan of "less code to look at" while solving the larger problem, so my knee-jerk reaction is to ship it off somewhere else.

What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. - Christopher Hitchens

Comment on Re: Can we have C-style Modularity?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Can we have C-style Modularity?
by sumeetgrover (Scribe) on Jan 20, 2011 at 14:31 UTC

    Thank you!

    I completely agree! In software design, such a programming style (as you might be aware) is called ADT (Abstract Data Types) and I am a big fan of it!

    Cheers guys.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://883234]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (13)
As of 2015-11-24 23:47 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (666 votes), past polls