Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Moose and static arrays

by JavaFan (Canon)
on Jan 21, 2011 at 13:42 UTC ( #883531=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Moose and static arrays

Where would you stop? What would you make an object? %King_Moves? Or should the list of possible moves also be objects? But even then, you can make the fields themselves objects as well. And fields are really intersections of rows and columns, so you could make row objects, column objects and intersection objects.

I would just leave it as is. Static data is just that, static data.

Comment on Re: Moose and static arrays
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Moose and static arrays
by hsmyers (Canon) on Jan 21, 2011 at 17:20 UTC
    Good point(s)! A solid case of nothing to be gained— leading to a strong 'if it is not broken then don't fix it' conclusion.


    "Never try to teach a pig to wastes your time and it annoys the pig."

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://883531]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2015-11-27 04:03 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (717 votes), past polls