Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Inconsistent ls -l results??

by ZZamboni (Curate)
on Jun 14, 2001 at 22:19 UTC ( #88544=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Inconsistent ls -l results??

Solaris comes with two versions of ls: the BSD version in /usr/ucb/ls, and the SystemV version in /usr/bin/ls. And it turns out that the -g flag has opposite effects. On the BSD version, -g makes it show the group of the file (which is not shown by default), whereas in the System V version, the group is shown by default, and -g hides it.

So the problem must be that your programs are using different paths, so they end up executing the different versions of ls.


Comment on Re: Inconsistent ls -l results??
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Inconsistent ls -l results??
by Anonymous Monk on Jun 14, 2001 at 22:26 UTC
    That sounds good. I don't use stat because stat returns only epochal time, and I would have to import an extra module to re-parse that into human-comprehensible calendrical time.
      Not true. localtime($epoch_time) will return an array with all the time components. And scalar(localtime($epoch_time)) will even give you a nicely formatted string.


        oh ok. The Date::Time or was it Time::Date or whatever has a similar function that takes a lot more complicated arguments. still, `date` works just fine for me. security is not really an issue in my environment.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://88544]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (2)
As of 2015-10-10 16:58 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (257 votes), past polls