Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re^5: Proving a UDP port is closed

by Anonymous Monk
on Feb 01, 2011 at 15:29 UTC ( #885517=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: Proving a UDP port is closed
in thread Proving a UDP port is closed

Is it possible for a listener to black-hole the port, and soak up messages (possibly acting on them) with no replies or indication that it has happened to the outside world?

Such a case would require checking for listener processes rather than just shouting at the computer and waiting for echoes.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: Proving a UDP port is closed
by davis (Vicar) on Feb 01, 2011 at 15:52 UTC

    Another good point. I suppose I could have "nc -lu 111" or similar running, and that might appear to be the same as "unreachable".

    I think this is nudging me down the netstat/lsof route...


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://885517]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (11)
As of 2016-10-21 13:49 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (289 votes). Check out past polls.