Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"

Re^3: NaNs are true (NaN == 0 -> true? Really?)

by pajout (Curate)
on Feb 27, 2011 at 11:50 UTC ( #890400=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: NaNs are true (NaN == 0 -> true? Really?)
in thread NaNs are true

What about idea that NaN never matches numerical comparison?
NaN == 0 #false NaN != 0 #false NaN == NaN #false NaN != NaN #false

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: NaNs are true (NaN == 0 -> true? Really?)
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Feb 27, 2011 at 12:11 UTC

    I think all of those are correct, though not particularly useful. They should also prompt (at least) a warning, though I think a catchable exception is better.

    You also have to be careful to distinguish between a variable containing NaN, and a constant NaN I think.

    That is, I think the only time any comparison involving a variable containg NaN should result in a true value, is if it is compared against a predefined constant NaN; were one to be provided. Though an isNaN( $x ) function or equivalenly $x->isNan() method would serve the same purpose and be less likely to confuse.

    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://890400]
[holli]: mmh
[holli]: that's strange

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (3)
As of 2017-09-23 11:45 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    During the recent solar eclipse, I:

    Results (272 votes). Check out past polls.