Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister PerlMonks

Re: Re: (Golf) Kaprekar's Process

 on Jun 17, 2001 at 00:47 UTC ( #89100=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: (Golf) Kaprekar's Process

```sub k {
\$_="000"|"@{[pop]}";/495/?0:1+k(-(\$_=join('',sort/./g)+reverse)
}
62

--sean

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: (Golf) Kaprekar's Process
by MeowChow (Vicar) on Jun 17, 2001 at 01:47 UTC
Verrrry cool idea... this can actually come down to 56:
```sub k {
\$_="000"|"@_";/495/?0:1+k(-(\$_=join'',sort/./g)+reverse)
}
The interesting thing about this is that it's not the same as right-formatting the number via sprintf, since the 0 goes to the back, but it doesn't matter because the digits are reordered anyway.
```   MeowChow
s aamecha.s a..a\u\$&owag.print```
Yeah, i realized the whole @{[pop]} bit wasn't needed about 20 miles from home, figured someone would've already noticed it by the time i got back.. Here's one more:
```sub k {
\$_=0 x3|"@_";/495/?0:1+k(-(\$_=join'',sort/./g)+reverse)
}
55

--sean
Nice ... It took me a sec to notice it was | and not ||. You can shave off a char by replacing "@_" with pop. I tried to save more, but each time I came up with the same # of chars, just a different way to do it. It almost looks obfuscated now : ), but here's a solution at 54:
```sub k {
\$_=\$-x3|pop;!/495/&&1+k(-(\$_=join\$k,sort/./g)+reverse)
}

Update:Nice catch Sean. I tested it, just not against numbers like 100 233. It looks like the am wins then, unless that can be beaten.

The 15 year old, freshman programmer,
Stephen Rawls

Nope..
by sean (Beadle) on Jun 18, 2001 at 09:01 UTC

Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://89100]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (4)
As of 2018-01-17 22:40 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
Voting Booth?
How did you see in the new year?

Results (206 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices?