Re: Tree::Nary Question

[toolic]

BrowserUk has shown us what the problem is.

I have a few other observations:

• Those messages are warnings, not errors, which means that your code continues to execute despite problems.
• It is good that you globally enabled warnings using -w because Tree::Nary does not have use warnings; in its .pm file (a bad thing).
• Tree::Nary methods perform no input validation (also a bad thing).

[Anonymous Monk]

Yeah, it was a total n00b mistake. Thanks guys!

[ikegami]

It should perform validation to catching things that are not errors? What?

[Dandello]

Tree::Nary is not checking that the information being passed to it is both valid and not dangerous to run.

While I'm not familiar with this module, it's always good to have the information being passed on to be checked for taint and validity.

[ikegami]

It's good cause it catches errors, right? My point was that it's silly to say the messages that result from such errors aren't error messages.