Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Why "Modern Perl" is slower than "Legacy Perl"?

by Tux (Canon)
on Jul 04, 2011 at 08:06 UTC ( [id://912605]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Why "Modern Perl" is slower than "Legacy Perl"?
in thread Why "Modern Perl" is slower than "Legacy Perl"?

I'm not surprised that threaded perl builds are slower. I know. I also know that the impact is much less now in more recent perl builds that it was in older perl versions. I can see on a day-to-day basis what the impact is of threads vs non-threads in my smoke status. Today it shows threaded is 5.3% slower than non-threaded. Look at the bottom.

I hereby would put the word "significantly" into a bit of a context. I still think that 5.3% is significant enough to not want a threaded perl build, as I NEVER ever saw the need for threads.

With more and more (useful) perl applications actually using threads (e.g. Padre won't even run without them), I can see people wanting them. For me any app requiring threads is reason enough to not even try it.


Enjoy, Have FUN! H.Merijn

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Why "Modern Perl" is slower than "Legacy Perl"?
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 04, 2011 at 08:32 UTC

    Threads make Win32 more bearable :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://912605]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-19 16:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found