Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re^3: renaming 1000's of FASTA files

by citromatik (Curate)
on Jul 11, 2011 at 16:14 UTC ( #913716=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: renaming 1000's of FASTA files
in thread renaming 1000's of FASTA files

But I don't see what bugs closing a file prevents

Running out of file descriptors?

$ cat /proc/sys/fs/file-max 386943


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: renaming 1000's of FASTA files
by Corion (Pope) on Jul 11, 2011 at 16:18 UTC

    But that's only an issue if you keep the filehandles around, isn't it? You can open lots and lots of files without an explicit close() and I'm not sure where explicitly closing files is better than just having the filehandle get re-opened or fall out of scope:

    for (1..100000) { open my $fh, $0; };

      I like explicit closes. I like explicit lots of things that Perl auto-does if given a chance.

      On the maintainability front, an explicit close() tells the maintainer that the author "meant to do that" and "here". No explicit close leaves questions. Did they mean to let it close automagically, or did they leave out the close where they really wanted it, etc.

      I rarely have the luxury of working with expert Perl programmers. The more that's done explicitly and clearly, the better for everyone involved.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://913716]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (7)
As of 2016-10-27 17:35 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How many different varieties (color, size, etc) of socks do you have in your sock drawer?

    Results (366 votes). Check out past polls.