Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Moores Law, Perl and the future

by jdporter (Paladin)
on Jul 15, 2011 at 02:44 UTC ( [id://914488]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Moores Law, Perl and the future
in thread Moores Law, Perl and the future

Well certainly you would think so. I think I'm pretty smart, too.

But as has been pointed out, your "XML" parser doesn't parse real XML, it parses a very simple syntax inspired by XML. Granted, for your purposes, that's sufficient. But it doesn't take a genius to make such a parser.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Moores Law, Perl and the future
by Logicus (Initiate) on Jul 15, 2011 at 08:42 UTC
    Oh rubbish, a recursive descending parser isn't difficult, but why would someone want to write one when there is already a CPAN module for that? XML::Simple / twig / etc.

      Wow, is that like: "Why would anyone want to design yet another templating system"?

      True laziness is hard work
        Yes why indeed, it's not like there isn't already a bunch of well developed templating systems, each of which comes with it's own proprietary logic control systems which have to be learned separately from the underlying perl which powers them. I can't possibly think of a reason to unify that situation, because if we did then people would only need to learn Perl and not Perl + a templating system, and well then it just might be too easy to be a perl programmer and we won't be able to demand such high wages.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://914488]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others avoiding work at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2024-04-20 01:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found