Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
"be consistent"
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is it a bug in perl6 ?

by TimToady (Parson)
on Aug 02, 2011 at 00:53 UTC ( #917945=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is it a bug in perl6 ?

You have a precedence error. [+] parses as a list operator, which is much looser than <=>. If you put parens around the first summation it will work as you expect in any of the implementations.


Comment on Re: Is it a bug in perl6 ?
Select or Download Code
Re^2: Is it a bug in perl6 ?
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 02, 2011 at 02:28 UTC

    Is any one of the various perl6 implementations yet complete, quick and stable enough for real work?

      I'll answer that if you tell me what percentage of monks are complete, quick, and stable enough for real work? :-)
        I'll answer that if you tell me what percentage of monks are complete, quick, and stable enough for real work?
        Rounding up to the nearest integer, I estimate that percentage to be 1. (People who are complete, quick and stable enough for real work, do real work and don't waste their time on Perlmonks)

        JavaFan (missing parts, slow and volatile)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://917945]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (10)
As of 2014-07-30 06:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (229 votes), past polls