Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Memory leak in Set::Object

by DrHyde (Prior)
on Aug 04, 2011 at 10:41 UTC ( #918493=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Memory leak in Set::Object

I can't verify the XS, but you've done everything right and I'd be happy to receive a bug report like this for one of my modules.

The only thing that would make it even better would be if you were to also include a test that fails with the old leaky code and passes when your patch is applied.

Comment on Re: Memory leak in Set::Object
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Memory leak in Set::Object
by parmus (Novice) on Aug 04, 2011 at 10:51 UTC

    I did (^_^) That's what is for. I've renamed it to internal_leaks.t and submitted all three scripts to the bug report.

    Thanks for the reply.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://918493]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-11-26 15:04 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (701 votes), past polls