http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=924056


in reply to Re^14: regexp class (no bugs)
in thread re: regexp class

No, you could not go further.

Like I said: sarcasm.

But at least we agree that using golfed code as a counter argument to the axiom: "that less code means less bugs", is a silly extreme.

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^16: regexp class (no bugs)
by JavaFan (Canon) on Sep 04, 2011 at 09:34 UTC
    You're spending an awful lot of time defending your position before declaring it sarcasm.

    And I'm not agreeing with you on anything here.

[reply]

      Sorry. I didn't know that it was necessary to declare sarcasm. Most people recognise it when they see it. Hell, I even added a smiley.

      Seems to me your the only one defending an untenable position.

      Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
      "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
      In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
[reply]
      A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Meditations