We don't bite newbies here... much | |
PerlMonks |
Re^13: regexp class (no bugs)by jdporter (Chancellor) |
on Sep 19, 2011 at 18:07 UTC ( [id://926786]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Alleged? By whom? When? [etc.] Exactly right. Hence, there is some grey area, due to the vagueness of "alleged". At least we agree on that point. The problem with not intelligently differentiating between missing features and bugs, is that it makes it impossible to prioritise properly. That's not particularly controversial, but it presumes that "bug" and "missing feature" can always, necessarily, be differentiated. I.e. it's premised upon you being right when you say "a missing feature is not a bug." And that pretty much addresses your "dependant [sic] feature" argument. It wasn't an argument, it was a mere observation.
I reckon we are the only monastery ever to have a dungeon stuffed with 16,000 zombies.
In Section
Meditations
|
|