Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked
 
PerlMonks  

Re: regex not working

by AnomalousMonk (Abbot)
on Oct 07, 2011 at 05:14 UTC ( #930106=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to regex not working

Let's look at the  /[$i]{$_}/ regex. The  [$i] defines a character class that matches whatever  $i interpolates as a string into the regex. In this case,  $i never changes: it is always the number 0 which interpolates as the '0' (zero) character, so the character class matches a '0' character and nothing else.

The  {$_} quantifier of the  [0] character class (which is the same as '0') takes on the values that  $_ interpolates into the regex on each iteration of the for-loop. These values are from the  @nums array and happen to be  (2, 0, 2, 0) successively.

So the  [$i]{$_} regex expression alternates between  0{2} and  0{0}. That's all there is to the regex. The  0{2} regex does not match (twice!) against the  $num string of '2020' because that string does not have two consecutive '0' characters anywhere in it. The  0{0} regex does match (again, twice) because there is a place in the '2020' string where there is no '0' character.

See perlre, perlretut, perlrequick.

Update: Rats. Missed the  $i++; statement. Of course, the analysis of jwkrahn is correct, while mine is wandering up and down in the street outside the ballpark. .oO(But was  $i++; present in the original original post, the one to which I replied? The more I think about it, the more I think it wasn't!)


Comment on Re: regex not working
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://930106]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-07-06 01:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (68 votes), past polls