Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: Am I Allowed to Make a New Compiler/Language using Perl?

by Corion (Pope)
on Oct 25, 2011 at 13:09 UTC ( #933620=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: Am I Allowed to Make a New Compiler/Language using Perl?
in thread Am I Allowed to Make a New Compiler/Language using Perl?

I think the GPL v3 comes close, or at least forces restrictions on the (distribution of) the output generated by a GPL v3 program. But I have solved this problem for me personally a long time before the GPL v3, so I haven't investigated whether that is really the case for things like a compiler. It seems to be the case for things like web application servers, where accessing the application over the web is basically identical to distribution of the application server binary.


Comment on Re^4: Am I Allowed to Make a New Compiler/Language using Perl?
Re^5: Am I Allowed to Make a New Compiler/Language using Perl?
by moritz (Cardinal) on Oct 25, 2011 at 13:30 UTC
    The GPL v3 text says
    The output from running a covered work is covered by this License only if the output, given its content, constitutes a covered work.

    and I have no idea what that means.

    There's an interesting FAQ entry, which contains the sentence

    If the user uses your program to enter or convert his own data, the copyright on the output belongs to him, not you

    Which seems to imply that if you write a compiler and license it under the GPLv3, the output still belongs to the user. Comforting.

      and I have no idea what that means.

      I think it means, increase the FAQ :)

      Consult the lawyers :)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://933620]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-07-28 13:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (199 votes), past polls