Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Your skill will accomplish
what the force of many cannot

Re^2: When to (and not to) use sv_2mortal()

by davido (Archbishop)
on Oct 28, 2011 at 18:14 UTC ( #934467=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: When to (and not to) use sv_2mortal() [first question only]
in thread When to (and not to) use sv_2mortal()

av_push, as documented, takes ownership of one reference count.

Ok, yes, I saw that documentation, and was unclear whether "takes ownership of one reference count" meant what it seems to mean (receives the existing reference count, up to a max of one), or whether it owns the responsibility of managing the ref-count by adding one to it. I knew I was trying to read too much into it but still managed to get it wrong. ;)

Thanks for clarification, and thanks for pointing out the AV* bug! That one was the one I wasn't even considering to be an issue. :) Strange though; I had been passing back 150000 element arrays in a loop that had thousands of iterations (just doing some testing) and hadn't seen the memory leak. Given the quantity of data, in retrospect it should have been enough of a leak to cause some swapping to take place, which I never saw.


  • Comment on Re^2: When to (and not to) use sv_2mortal()

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://934467]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (6)
As of 2018-05-21 22:12 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?