Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?!

by chromatic (Archbishop)
on Dec 13, 2011 at 07:09 UTC ( #943259=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?!
in thread Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?!

The ability to deal with the problem of backwards compatibility has been around since at least 2000, but the will has not been there. What we have instead (the silly feature pragma) had the best of intentions.

The only true solution has to include requiring a version declaration in every file, lest you get whatever the default behavior of the current version.


Improve your skills with Modern Perl: the free book.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Why do people say 'Perl' is dead?!?!
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 13, 2011 at 09:34 UTC

    Why do you keep saying Perl 5 is not doing well? I mean Moose and associated stuff is actually doing a pretty great job in taking care of those extensibility problems, aren't they?

    Also I think its best to leave Perl 6 folks to themselves. No one know what is going to come out of it. Worse case, all those learnings can be pulled back in to Perl 5.

    May be through a more extensible P5 core, we can get all syntax we have in P6 in P5.

      Why do you keep saying Perl 5 is not doing well?

      Where did I say that? I think you're reading a lot into specific technical criticisms of Perl 5.

      Worse case, all those learnings can be pulled back in to Perl 5.

      In 20 years of gradual evolution perhaps. You have to change many, many things, including the basic container/value model and the Perl 5 notion of type morphing, to make a lot of Perl 6 features possible.


      Improve your skills with Modern Perl: the free book.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://943259]
help
Chatterbox?
[Corion]: Yeah, you can lead them to water, but it's illegal to drown them...
[Discipulus]: Here my solution marto: create a win fake machine insied AD. do a micro fake partition foreach remote partition you wont to monit. put a web server that acept from data from remote systems and full fake partition as needed. fake partition are Mb. ;=)
[marto]: Discipulus yeah, the nuclear industry love fake machines sitting around on a controlled domain :P
[marto]: changing a typo on a website is often a great deal of paper work :P

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (11)
As of 2017-01-24 10:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Do you watch meteor showers?




    Results (203 votes). Check out past polls.