Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks DiBona
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re: RFC iEngine

by Anonymous Monk
on Jan 11, 2012 at 00:10 UTC ( #947266=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RFC iEngine

That doesn't look like an improvement over any exiting templating/publishing system, sorry :) iNoLike iPointless iBusyWork


Comment on Re: RFC iEngine
Re^2: RFC iEngine
by muscipula (Novice) on Jan 11, 2012 at 15:40 UTC

    OK, name me something that is along the lines that I am suggesting.

    And as for your comments on the codename I am using, it is a joke as I wont decide on a name until I have a working system.

    You guys who always seem to pop up with so-called witty remarks never really make any valid point other than 'it has been done' but never manage to produce an example.

    Please indulge me, provide something that does just what I am suggesting otherwise why bother.

    Andrew

      You guys who always seem to pop up with so-called witty remarks never really make any valid point other than 'it has been done' but never manage to produce an example.

      That's quiet a bold generalization, care to provide some examples of this behavior you claim "always" occurs?

        You don't get the point I am trying to make here either. The generic term 'witty' is what I am referring to. You only have to look at this 'anonymous' monk's remarks regarding the name alone, of which ain't that relevant to the whole topic.

        There again, you do not seem to provide a 'genuine' example either, that it is claimed that my idea is 'done', or rather in other words, re-inventing the wheel.

        Andrew

      OK, name me something that is along the lines that I am suggesting.

      You mean something other than: pick any operating system, any bash, any templating system ( from anywhere or cpan ttree / Template::Tutorial::Web ), and go ?

      Sure, here you go, http://mojolicious.org/

      :) Is that sufficiently witty?

      I can't really point to something already existing because so far , the only distinguishing feature has been, an interactive shell, with one command per line -- already available on every single computer platform

      Sure, creating templates on the command line, is not very context sensitive in the way you describe, but then its less verbose than your proposed context sensitive alternative

      Actually, what you're suggesting sounds more and more line a gVim Shell plugin, except without the editor features of gVim -- Oh great, we're back to bash and them :)

      Oh, but you say the problem, you don't want to bolt a bunch of binaries on top of each other, you want to create an operating system --- no thank, iNoLike iPointless iBusyWork

      It actually sounds like you might be satisfied with webkit kitsh / PhantomJS -- can't say I'd use either to create content

        OK, the three examples you have provided may loosely do the same as I am suggesting, but they are essentially a programming language.

        However, HAML, which jdrago999 kindly mentioned - without the rude attitude you have - is much closer to what I am talking about. But then, it is still a little verbose as you say. In fact my proposal is to remove the verbosity and make methods that are easier to create, build, store and maintain your content.

        Stop trying to be clever mate and maybe grow up and contribute rather than act like a clown.

        Andrew

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://947266]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-04-17 14:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (449 votes), past polls