Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks DiBona
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Hockey Sticks

by tobyink (Abbot)
on Jan 24, 2012 at 01:06 UTC ( #949562=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Hockey Sticks

As much as I like Perl 6, all its implementations are right now missing the one killer feature that could drive adoption. And I don't mean heredocs in Rakudo.

Imagine I wanted to port some of my Perl 5 modules to Perl 6. What exactly would that entail? A more or less line-by-line translation of a module might take, say, 30 seconds per line of code, so maybe 2 or 3 hours for a smallish module.

And yay, I'm done. Or actually, maybe I've hardly begun because the first few lines of my script were:

use LWP::UserAgent; use RDF::Trine; use XML::LibXML;

... d'oh! Now I've got another few months ahead of me in my porting exercise.

This is a major problem for people hoping to use Perl 6 for actual work. People say that CPAN is the best feature of Perl. If Perl 6 doesn't have CPAN, then no matter what other features it does have, it's missing the best feature of Perl.

I'm not saying that Perl 6 needs to reimplement all of Perl 5. It just needs to embed libperl so that Perl 6 code can load and use Perl 5 modules. While not trivial, this seems achievable.

I think perhaps many of the Perl 6 developers are afraid to implement such a thing, because if Perl 6 can run Perl 5 code, people have less of an incentive to port their Perl 5 code to Perl 6. But I disagree - I think that the burden of having to port not only your own code, but any underlying libraries you use acts as a strong disincentive right now.


Comment on Re: Hockey Sticks
Download Code
Re^2: Hockey Sticks
by educated_foo (Vicar) on Jan 25, 2012 at 11:05 UTC
    When I last paid any attention, Perl 6 was intended to be able to run Perl 5 code unmodified, and allow new Perl 6 code to interact with old Perl 5 code. Of course, maybe the spec has changed since then.
Perl 5, CPAN, and Perl 6 (Re^2: Hockey Sticks)
by raiph (Friar) on Jan 26, 2012 at 01:52 UTC
    Larry has planned use of Perl 5 and CPAN from within Perl 6 from the start. I am confident several approaches will get implemented, once the right pieces are in place. I agree it will make a huge difference.

    One approach is embedding libperl.

    jnthn's blizkost enables Perl 5 code to be executed within Parrot (and hence using Rakudo on Parrot). I think jnthn recently said that blizkost is currently broken and that he hopes to fix it in the next few weeks.

    Aiui, blizkost currently does very little, just eval'ing a single line of perl5 code, and not even making use of the result. I think that developing it toward supporting Perl 5 modules was blocked on other progress, in particular implementing 6model. Maybe it'll move forward this year.

    Update August, 2013: P5 Interop grant application

    Alternatively, once Perl 6 is sufficiently complete, it might be "relatively easy" and compelling to implement a Perl 5 compiler in Perl 6. So that'll be another plausible approach to using some CPAN modules.

    Update August, 2013: FROGGS' 20 minute video introducing the Perl 5 Slang of Perl 6

    I can imagine others. There are complications whichever approach is used. For some approaches, XS will always be a bridge too far.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://949562]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (9)
As of 2014-04-19 05:12 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    April first is:







    Results (478 votes), past polls