Re: "Automated" benchmarking

The type of tool you are looking for is called a "profiler". Typing that into CPAN yields many hits.

My personal preference is Devel::SmallProf. If you are a fan of verbosity and pretty pictures, you may like Devel::NYTProf.

With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'

Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.

"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".

In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

Comment on Re: "Automated" benchmarking

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: "Automated" benchmarking by salva (Canon) on Jan 24, 2012 at 12:00 UTC
Besides the verbose and pretty output of Devel::NYTProf it is also quite more accurate than Devel::SmallProf!	[reply]
Re^3: "Automated" benchmarking by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 24, 2012 at 12:02 UTC
In what way? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. The start of some sanity?	[reply]
Re^4: "Automated" benchmarking by salva (Canon) on Jan 24, 2012 at 12:41 UTC
The overhead introduced by Devel::SmallProf for every Perl sentence executed is too high resulting in a non-linear distortion of time measurements.	[reply]
Re^5: "Automated" benchmarking by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Jan 24, 2012 at 13:12 UTC
Re^6: "Automated" benchmarking by salva (Canon) on Jan 24, 2012 at 13:42 UTC
Some notes below your chosen depth have not been shown here
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.