Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options

Re^2: TDD of non-module code

by davies (Parson)
on Jan 24, 2012 at 14:51 UTC ( #949702=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: TDD of non-module code
in thread TDD of non-module code

Your suggestion regarding do looks very interesting. But to go through your points in order:

My concern about "exposure" (which might not be the best word) is that either I would have to use something like Exporter and end up with sub names in a namespace where I haven't planned for them to be (risking unintended consequences) or I have to use namespace::sub to call them. Maybe it's just prejudice on my part, but this doesn't appeal to me. I can't express my reservations clearly, but I feel uncomfortable doing it.

As far as adding another level of indirection is concerned, I have no difficulty describing my reservations! :-) I am already passing references around in such a way that leads to code like if (defined $${$${$hashref}{'refTextAry'}}[0]) {. In a separate file, I have over 100 lines of code explaining to myself just why this works. "Just one more level of indirection" fills me with terror. I really wouldn't trust myself to be able to write working tests.

I am definitely interested in do, though. Unfortunately, the docs seem confusing, at least at first glance.


Uses the value of EXPR as a filename and executes the contents of the file as a Perl script.

do '';

is just like

eval `cat`;
isn't a good start for me. The only time I've met cat is as the Unix equivalent of type, which seems to contradict "executes ... a Perl script". Your explanation seems far clearer, but I'll have to do some experimenting to find out what is and isn't possible.

Thanks & regards,

John Davies

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://949702]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (7)
As of 2017-04-24 01:47 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    I'm a fool:

    Results (433 votes). Check out past polls.