From a library point of view, I find it of tremendous quality, it has documentation and it does what it says it will do. From a coders point of view, it doesn't use strict, has some global space pollution I am not familiar with github and will look into it.
| [reply] |
| [reply] |
It sounds like it might be useful for a side project I'm starting -- the XML to PDF conversion is appealing, and I'd at least look at it, likely use it, and be willing to take a shot at contributing to it. I'm mostly interested in being able to generate nice looking eBooks that would be generated by mostly non-technical people (which is why I'm interested in the XML). There are various open source things out there for editing and generating eBooks, but even the relatively mature ones seem fairly limited.
| [reply] |
You can see the doc at: Documentation and an output file created using the XML generation method at: Sample (the charts were created using the chart director library)
| [reply] |
| [reply] |
| [reply] |
