|laziness, impatience, and hubris|
Re^5: Modern Perl 2011-2012 Editionby jdporter (Canon)
|on Mar 09, 2012 at 03:15 UTC||Need Help??|
If you had copied the entire review in full...After skimming both, I believe the OP did so.
Oh. You're right. It does seem so. I wish I had noticed, so that I could have taken the other lemma, annoyed but not enough to say anything. For that, I apologize.
That's a silly logical fallacy and quite irrelevant.
Suffice it to say that we disagree entirely on this point.
The relevant question to me seems to be...
That's one relevant question.
not worth arguing.
I guess we don't share that evaluation of the situation.
I also think that maybe, given your interest in this particular case, you ought to recuse yourself.