Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Code Review Time!

by linuxkid (Sexton)
on Mar 15, 2012 at 22:26 UTC ( #959877=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Code Review Time!
in thread Code Review Time!

I've been working with perl for about 3 years, and using warnings and strict breaks everything, and it's annoying when it's something that people who just know how to type and use a mouse will end up using have to get the stuff from it.

--linuxkid


imrunningoutofideas.co.cc


Comment on Re^2: Code Review Time!
Re^3: Code Review Time!
by Anonymous Monk on Mar 16, 2012 at 03:20 UTC

    I've been working with perl for about 3 years, and using warnings and strict breaks everything, and it's annoying when it's something that people who just know how to type and use a mouse will end up using have to get the stuff from it.

    Read this if you want to cut your development time in half!

      i'd be willing to use diagnostics during developmet

      --linuxkid


      imrunningoutofideas.co.cc
Re^3: Code Review Time!
by eyepopslikeamosquito (Canon) on Mar 16, 2012 at 21:58 UTC

    Wow, I've not seen such a rant since BK coined "use strict is gay" way back in 2001 (which inspired Acme::USIG).

    Update: Though the original historic bulletin board response from "bk" to Dave Cross is currently available via the Wayback Machine link above, I also embed the original text (including typos) below because it is too important to Perl history to risk losing:

    Posted By: bk
    Date: Wednesday, 2 May 2001, at 2:29 p.m.

    In Response To: Re: Will this work? (Dave Cross)

    No,but its true-- strict really does suck. I hate it. Its gay. Dont tell me ehat to do. And nobody wants your to be back, either.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://959877]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others exploiting the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-07-30 08:32 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (229 votes), past polls