Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister

Re^3: SOAP::Lite and custom envelopes

by Anonymous Monk
on Mar 19, 2012 at 15:41 UTC ( #960433=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: SOAP::Lite and custom envelopes
in thread SOAP::Lite and custom envelopes

why use SOAP at all?

Because you're brain damaged :D See REST-vs-SOAP a parable and The REST Dialogs

FWIW, yes, SOAP::Lite is limited, but there are alternatives like SOAP::WSDL and XML::Compile::SOAP::Client/SOAP::Simple

Comment on Re^3: SOAP::Lite and custom envelopes
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: SOAP::Lite and custom envelopes
by tryingHard (Initiate) on Jun 24, 2015 at 17:52 UTC
    Solved: verify end server is functioning and connectivity before trying to learn perl's adaption for it.
Re^4: SOAP::Lite and custom envelopes
by glasswalk3r (Pilgrim) on Mar 27, 2012 at 05:02 UTC

    When I tried to use SOAP::Lite with a .Net class, I spent a lot of time trying to make the .Net understand the service's WSDL (that I had to do basically manually). It didn't work.

    Then I tried to reverse the order, making a Perl SOAP client for the .Net service. Again SOAP::Lite didn't help because I couldn't read the WSDL and create a stub.

    That might have changed by now, but SOAP::Lite cannot work with SOAP document style, which is the defaul option for .Net (it uses RPC style).

    XML::Compile::SOAP::Client worked much better in this case.

    Alceu Rodrigues de Freitas Junior
    "You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." - Sir Winston Churchill

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://960433]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (17)
As of 2015-11-30 19:07 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (778 votes), past polls