|Perl: the Markov chain saw|
Re^5: RFC: Review of "Seekers of Perl Wisdom" descrition?by BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Apr 09, 2012 at 17:47 UTC||Need Help??|
I don't see anything in JD's post that suggests we need rules for this:
I don't think that having one "RTFM" type answer among the several that a querent receives is necessarily a bad thing.
As usual, just a very fair minded: one amongst others does no harm.
But the moment you make a rule that the OP has to prove due diligence before they may expect anything other than a RTFM/LMGTFY/WHYT reponse, you open the flood gates to the race to see who can post it first.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.