Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: An irrational coding choice found

by Anonymous Monk
on Apr 15, 2012 at 07:42 UTC ( #965138=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to An irrational coding choice found

Have you ever made a coding choice that later you can not rationalize?

All the time, until I started using version control and reviewing my choices on a weekly , even daily basis ( refactoring ).

Its like when you first start writing code, you end up with 10-20 line if-blocks, 3-5-8 indentation levels deep, and it feels very comfortable because its all very fresh in your mind.

It's not until you're forced to revisit that code a year later that you realize how difficult it is to read, and start turning each long if-block (or indentation level ) into a function (refactoring).

schwern has a slideshow about this skimmable code where he tackles refactoring WWW::Mechanize

There is also a shorter version of the skimmable code talk, in the longer version he subliminally introduces Method::Signatures


Comment on Re: An irrational coding choice found

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://965138]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (8)
As of 2014-08-20 12:52 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (113 votes), past polls