Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister
 
PerlMonks  

Re: ithreads or fork() what you recommend?

by Eliya (Vicar)
on May 18, 2012 at 20:10 UTC ( #971361=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to ithreads or fork() what you recommend?

It would help if you could describe a bit more what the processes or threads need to be doing. For example, do they need to share data, or synchronize themselves somehow? If so, this would be a pro-thread argument, because these things are more difficult to do with independent processes. Otherwise, fork is likely the more solid/stable solution.


Comment on Re: ithreads or fork() what you recommend?
Re^2: ithreads or fork() what you recommend?
by pawan68923 (Novice) on May 19, 2012 at 06:44 UTC
    Thanks Eliya! Best regards, Pawan

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://971361]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others chilling in the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-08-31 09:37 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The best computer themed movie is:











    Results (294 votes), past polls