Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re: ithreads or fork() what you recommend?

by Eliya (Vicar)
on May 18, 2012 at 20:10 UTC ( #971361=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to ithreads or fork() what you recommend?

It would help if you could describe a bit more what the processes or threads need to be doing. For example, do they need to share data, or synchronize themselves somehow? If so, this would be a pro-thread argument, because these things are more difficult to do with independent processes. Otherwise, fork is likely the more solid/stable solution.


Comment on Re: ithreads or fork() what you recommend?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: ithreads or fork() what you recommend?
by pawan68923 (Novice) on May 19, 2012 at 06:44 UTC
    Thanks Eliya! Best regards, Pawan

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://971361]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (11)
As of 2015-07-28 22:05 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (259 votes), past polls