Re^2: Confusion over B::PV (POK)

[mje]

in reply to Re: Confusion over B::PV (POK)
in thread Confusion over B::PV

I think ikegami answered my question. I thought PV simply returned the string pointer which is really what PVX does. As such I was surprised PV was false but the scalar had a pv.

The should be set test comment was left over from the fact that another bug masked the fact that test should have failed. Now that is fixed I am expecting PV to return undef and don't care there is a pv pointer.