Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Ruby vs Perl vs LISP; the killer feature lacking in Ruby

by Jenda (Abbot)
on May 21, 2012 at 16:26 UTC ( #971657=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: Ruby vs Perl vs LISP; the killer feature lacking in Ruby
in thread Ruby vs Perl vs LISP; the killer feature lacking in Ruby

multifoo sub { $_ * 2}, sub { foo ($_) }, @things;
hoopsy hoops, right?

And now the method body:

sub onefoo { my ($reasonably_named_sub, @params) = @_; whatever; for my $foo (tweaked @params) { $reasonably_named_sub->($foo); } } sub multifoo { my ($toDo, $filter, @params) = @_; whatever; for my $foo (grep $filter->(), tweaked @params) { $toDo->($foo); } }
Yieieiaield anyone?

There is a little syntactic sugar for functions (not methods) in Perl, but the difference between using the sugar and not is tiny. If I need to pass two "pieces of code" into my subroutine, I pass them, I name them and I call them the same way I would if I had just one.

In Ruby, if your method gets a single block/closure parameter, you do not get to name the parameter, you use the ill-named statement yield and it kinda, behind the scenes, maybe, works. If you need to pass two you are, basically, screwed. But then 640KB ought to be ... I mean one block ought to be enough for anybody.

Jenda
Enoch was right!
Enjoy the last years of Rome.


Comment on Re^3: Ruby vs Perl vs LISP; the killer feature lacking in Ruby
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://971657]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-07-04 08:26 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (58 votes), past polls