Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things

Re^5: PAR::Packer issuing pp utility

by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 03, 2012 at 10:06 UTC ( #974106=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^4: PAR::Packer issuing pp utility
in thread PAR::Packer issuing pp utility

I have already installed this module so in this instance it is a par problem

I agree, par/pp is too hard to use

Its like you run into a problem, find the answer, then marto points it out again, but its still just too hard to add the -X option

Comment on Re^5: PAR::Packer issuing pp utility
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^6: PAR::Packer issuing pp utility
by diamondsandperls (Beadle) on Jun 09, 2012 at 03:57 UTC
    i tried the -X par::packer is unusable unless you use very little modules

      There's a difference between -X as you claim to have tried, and -x which has been suggested to you several times now. pp has no restrictions regarding module size.

      -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x -x

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://974106]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (4)
As of 2015-11-28 10:59 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    What would be the most significant thing to happen if a rope (or wire) tied the Earth and the Moon together?

    Results (741 votes), past polls