Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Clear questions and runnable code
get the best and fastest answer
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 04, 2012 at 04:51 UTC ( #974223=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
in thread What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

~> is less characters, but is more travel. I like ->> because it's the same input as -> but with the last character repeated.

~> also looks too similar to -> on some fonts at a glance, so ->> has the advantage of being shaped differently. Of course it does have the disadvantage that a junior might think it's a typo and 'fix' it.


Comment on Re^2: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
Select or Download Code
Re^3: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
by cavac (Chaplain) on Jun 17, 2012 at 18:23 UTC

    I agree,
    ~> and
    -> are just too similar.

    Depending on the font (and you can not always choose the one you like, especially online), you really have to look hard. I pretty much guarantee that code audits as well as helping out on SoPW will get a lot harder.

    As for the typing effort, a character more or less really doesn't matter. Those of us who use non-english keyboards (so, most of us really) already have a hard time coding Perl and other programming languages. Some examples from my german keyboard:

    • ~ is (Alt Gr)(+)
    • \ is (Alt Gr)()
    • { is (Alt Gr)(7)
    • [ is (Alt Gr)(8)

    In effect, a lot of the "standard" metacharacters require awkward right-hand-only acrobatics. I thought about using an english/american keyboard, but since i also require german umlauts that would just shift the problem. Just changing the keyboard layout in software is also a bit awkward, since then the printing on the keys does not match what i type (which i find rather confusing).

    In short, i don't care if i have to type two or three characters, since something like ?-> is easier to read and harder to overlook (and in this case actually easier to type on my german keyboard as well).

    And, from my personal view, i always associate ~ operations with some kind of regular expression stuff, whereas ? does not.

    "You have reached the Monastery. All our helpdesk monks are busy at the moment. Please press "1" to instantly donate 10 currency units for a good cause or press "2" to hang up. Or you can dial "12" to get connected directly to second level support."

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://974223]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2015-07-04 06:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (57 votes), past polls