Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

by Anonymous Monk
on Jun 04, 2012 at 04:51 UTC ( #974223=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
in thread What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

~> is less characters, but is more travel. I like ->> because it's the same input as -> but with the last character repeated.

~> also looks too similar to -> on some fonts at a glance, so ->> has the advantage of being shaped differently. Of course it does have the disadvantage that a junior might think it's a typo and 'fix' it.


Comment on Re^2: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
Select or Download Code
Re^3: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
by cavac (Chaplain) on Jun 17, 2012 at 18:23 UTC

    I agree,
    ~> and
    -> are just too similar.

    Depending on the font (and you can not always choose the one you like, especially online), you really have to look hard. I pretty much guarantee that code audits as well as helping out on SoPW will get a lot harder.

    As for the typing effort, a character more or less really doesn't matter. Those of us who use non-english keyboards (so, most of us really) already have a hard time coding Perl and other programming languages. Some examples from my german keyboard:

    • ~ is (Alt Gr)(+)
    • \ is (Alt Gr)()
    • { is (Alt Gr)(7)
    • [ is (Alt Gr)(8)

    In effect, a lot of the "standard" metacharacters require awkward right-hand-only acrobatics. I thought about using an english/american keyboard, but since i also require german umlauts that would just shift the problem. Just changing the keyboard layout in software is also a bit awkward, since then the printing on the keys does not match what i type (which i find rather confusing).

    In short, i don't care if i have to type two or three characters, since something like ?-> is easier to read and harder to overlook (and in this case actually easier to type on my german keyboard as well).

    And, from my personal view, i always associate ~ operations with some kind of regular expression stuff, whereas ? does not.

    "You have reached the Monastery. All our helpdesk monks are busy at the moment. Please press "1" to instantly donate 10 currency units for a good cause or press "2" to hang up. Or you can dial "12" to get connected directly to second level support."

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://974223]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (16)
As of 2014-07-14 15:54 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (268 votes), past polls