Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

Re: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

by LanX (Canon)
on Jun 07, 2012 at 21:45 UTC ( #975055=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?

after some days of thoughts an digestion I'd really prefer ->>

Not only because it's easy to type, it's close enough to -> be easily read and understood as an extension for a special case

This follows the same approach like == and === in JS, where repetition indicates a specialization.

~> looks nice at first glance, but is too easy to be overlooked in some fonts and at the moment I have to deal with too many low level Perl users who wouldn't spot it.

?-> or &-> might have a derivable logic, but look too much like line noise.

And it's not very consequent to allow &-> if we are sure that there will never be a |-> or !->.

Cheers Rolf


Comment on Re: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
Select or Download Code
Re^2: What operator should perl5porters use for safe dereferencing?
by trwww (Priest) on Jun 08, 2012 at 17:56 UTC
    I voted on ~> but now I agree with you, ->>
      I voted on ~> ...

      Unfortunately, me too.

      Cheers Rolf

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://975055]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others contemplating the Monastery: (14)
As of 2015-07-03 13:01 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (53 votes), past polls