note
BrowserUk
<blockquote><i>trying to compare mixes of the words with letter substitutions is fruitless.</i></blockquote>
<p>If you had read the post to which I was responding, you'd have realised that that is <i>exactly the point I was making!</i>
<P>Did you actually <i>read all the way down</i> to the <b>third line of my post</b> where I said:
<blockquote><i>(You cannot break multi-character operators into bits to try and make sense of them!)</i></blockquote>
<p>So before you jump to conclusions, read not just one post and then respond, but also the context in which that post was made.
<blockquote><i>That is absurd.</i></blockquote>
<p>What I did -- emphasis the illogical through parody -- was eminently logical.
<p>What you did -- take a post out-of-context, and build an argument around your own misinterpretation of it -- was absurd.
<p>But don't feel too bad about it; you are not the first, nor will you be the last to do so.
<p>The only thing you should watch out for, is the temptation to compound your mistake, by trying to defend it.
<p>Good will!
<div class="pmsig"><div class="pmsig-171588">
<hr />
<font size=1 >
<div>With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'</div>
<div>Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.</div>
<div>"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". </div>
<div>In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
<p align=right>[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/29/sas_versus_world_programming/|The start of some sanity?]</p></div>
</font>
</div></div>
973015
978999