Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
XP is just a number
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous

by anazawa (Beadle)
on Aug 03, 2012 at 01:45 UTC ( #985141=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous
in thread 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous

Thanks for your suggestion. Your code output the following:

Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::each(), qualify as such or use & at a +mbiguous_calls.pl line 12. Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::chop(), qualify as such or use & at a +mbiguous_calls.pl line 18. dump() better written as CORE::dump() at ambiguous_calls.pl line 19. Ambiguous call resolved as CORE::dump(), qualify as such or use & at a +mbiguous_calls.pl line 19. name: Ken Takakura main::our() was called at ambiguous_calls.pl line 8. Use of uninitialized value $person{"name"} in scalar chop at ambiguous +_calls.pl line 18. Abort

This result shows us that delete and our belong to "weak keywords", and each, chop and dump don't.

The following was quoted from regen/keywords.pl:

145: -chop 160: +delete 163: -dump 164: -each 261: +our

Plus (+) signs maybe mean "weak".

Your comment meant a lot to me :)


Comment on Re^2: 'Ambiguous call' diagnosis seems ambiguous
Select or Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://985141]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others studying the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-07-10 19:13 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    When choosing user names for websites, I prefer to use:








    Results (215 votes), past polls