Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Problems? Is your data what you think it is?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^5: javascript login

by aitap (Deacon)
on Aug 17, 2012 at 06:54 UTC ( #987919=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^4: javascript login
in thread javascript login

I don't see any mistakes, does it work?

Sorry if my advice was wrong.


Comment on Re^5: javascript login
Re^6: javascript login
by robertw (Sexton) on Aug 17, 2012 at 17:59 UTC

    for all 4 lines it gives an error global symbol $userid requires explicit package name global symbol $password requires explicit package name global symbol $userid requires explicit package name global symbol $password requires explicit package name

    $userid = "usr"; $password = "passwd"; userid => "$userid", password => "$password"

      it gives an error global symbol $userid requires explicit package name
      Perhaps this is because you use strict and these variables are not declared?

      Sorry if my advice was wrong.
        I put strict off and it gives no errors, then i ran it and it gave line 6 unknown agent 'firefox' and line 1900 of mechanize.pm says there is no form numbered 2, How can i resolve the first error and where does it say the form of html? sorry I am slow in this but I appreciate your help very much:)
        my $mech = WWW::Mechanize->new(); $mech->agent_alias( 'Firefox' ); $userid = "usr"; $password = "password"; $mech->get( "https://login.binck.nl/klanten/Login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fkl +anten%2fdefault.aspx" ); $mech->submit_form( form_number => 2, fields => { userid => "$userid", password => "$password" }, button => "btnSignon" );

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://987919]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (15)
As of 2014-07-31 13:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    My favorite superfluous repetitious redundant duplicative phrase is:









    Results (248 votes), past polls