|Syntactic Confectionery Delight|
Re: Iterating though an array of objectsby Athanasius (Canon)
|on Aug 27, 2012 at 13:16 UTC||Need Help??|
Hello rjhill, and welcome to the Monastery!
In addition to the points noted by moritz above, the statement
references a non-existent object member “name”; this should be either
The latter is better as it does not break the object’s encapsulation. I suspect this was the syntax you were looking for.
Also, the statement
references an object member “version” which is not declared or initialised in package person.
A final note: It is usual practice to begin the name of a user-defined package with a capital letter: package Person;.
Hope that helps,
Athanasius <°(((>< contra mundum