in reply to Re^2: RFC: New style for argument check in subs
in thread RFC: New style for argument check in subs
use Filter::Simple ??? are you serious?
absolutely, makes things much nicer
use base 'Devel::Declare::MethodInstaller::Simple' ??? are you serious?
absolutely, its for those who want sugar but not source filters -- schwern says its reliable
nice but ... - overhead by extra sub call
HA! are you serous? You can't be serious :)
- parameters are unpacked into %p hash, i.e. you need to type $p{x} to access x
this isn't the only usage, there is validate_pos, and even as Attribute::Params::Validate
and you'll miss all the benefits of compiletime checks for lexicals like my $x.
What compile-time checks?
So any serious arguments other than clicking thru CPAN?
You're looking for arguments about something? About what?
Hey look, these are compile-time :) fields, Hash::Util::lock_keys, Sub::NamedParams
If you're referring to so which pattern do you think is better? to me there really isn't much difference between them -- not that your mission makes sense to me
Even if I'm typing this stuff myself, I'm fine with
defined $pos1 or die "missing arg"; defined $pos2 or $pos2 = 42;
but I wouldn't mix that and my ($name1,$name2) = @arg{qw/name1 name2/};
I would use a hash or a flatlist