Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: RFC: New style for argument check in subs

by chip (Curate)
on Sep 10, 2012 at 07:48 UTC ( #992695=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: RFC: New style for argument check in subs
in thread RFC: New style for argument check in subs

Method::Signatures -- yes, I am serious. It's good.

Method::Signatures::Simple -- yes, I am serious again. It's still good.

The computer can handle working harder. You can't.

    -- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos


Comment on Re^3: RFC: New style for argument check in subs
Re^4: RFC: New style for argument check in subs
by LanX (Canon) on Sep 10, 2012 at 09:49 UTC
    I don't deny it's good, but I have serious problems with such dependencies.

    If it' so good make it core and I'll use it as soon as Debian supports the perlversion.

    In the meantime I like a good style which works w/o XS dependencies.

    Cheers Rolf

      Long experience has taught me that distribution Perl, including Debian, exists to support the code in the distribution, not to support a Perl developer. I strongly recommend building your own Perl and not avoiding XS. Your choice, of course.

          -- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos

        nope, not my choice, corporate's choice.

        Cheers Rolf

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://992695]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (12)
As of 2015-07-06 07:20 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (70 votes), past polls