Re^4: RFC: New style for argument check in subs


Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer
	PerlMonks

by LanX (Monsignor)

on Sep 10, 2012 at 09:49 UTC ( #992710=note: print w/ replies, xml )

Need Help??

I don't deny it's good, but I have serious problems with such dependencies.

If it' so good make it core and I'll use it as soon as Debian supports the perlversion.

In the meantime I like a good style which works w/o XS dependencies.

Cheers Rolf

Comment on Re^4: RFC: New style for argument check in subs
Re^5: RFC: New style for argument check in subs by chip (Curate) on Sep 10, 2012 at 20:21 UTC
Long experience has taught me that distribution Perl, including Debian, exists to support the code in the distribution, not to support a Perl developer. I strongly recommend building your own Perl and not avoiding XS. Your choice, of course. -- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos	[reply]
Re^6: RFC: New style for argument check in subs by LanX (Monsignor) on Sep 10, 2012 at 22:48 UTC
nope, not my choice, corporate's choice. Cheers Rolf	[reply]
Re^7: RFC: New style for argument check in subs by chip (Curate) on Sep 11, 2012 at 20:06 UTC
You are not assigned to a workplace, are you? You should reconsider working on Perl in a way that will stagnate your skills. -- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos	[reply]

In Section Meditations

Node Status^?

node history
Node Type: note [id://992710]
help

Chatterbox^?

How do I use this? | Other CB clients

Other Users^?

Others wandering the Monastery: (17)

As of 2013-05-24 16:31 GMT

Sections^?

Information^?

Find Nodes^?

Leftovers^?

Voting Booth^?