Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Testing for websites?

by rjt (Deacon)
on Sep 17, 2012 at 03:40 UTC ( #993952=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Testing for websites?

You might want to have a look at WWW::Mechanize. It can definitely handle the heavy lifting of the testing automation.

You will probably also benefit from unit testing the lower layers of your application. Do all of your library functions have unit tests that (reasonably) cover all kinds of inputs, good or bad? Test::More is your friend, here. You can also play with Test::Simple if you're new to the Perl testing style.

You will still of course need some human QA (write a test plan for your testers that covers your requirements), but the automation can certainly help you catch coding errors more quickly.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://993952]
help
Chatterbox?
[rajesh_perl]: Hi
[rajesh_perl]: thanks for editing it
beech testing firefox 52.0.1
beech me me me me
beech mi
beech eieie
beech .oO( *you* don't exist, I'm only messaging to *me* self),
[beech]: *me

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2017-03-28 07:08 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should Pluto Get Its Planethood Back?



    Results (327 votes). Check out past polls.