Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re^3: XML::Twig newbie question

by Anonymous Monk
on Sep 18, 2012 at 07:31 UTC ( #994219=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: XML::Twig newbie question
in thread XML::Twig newbie question

Another way would be to make the subroutine curried (that is expecting to get the parameters separately, not all at once):

Sure, you could write your closure that way ( the schönfinkeling way), but it gains you nothing in this example, it just takes a little more memory

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: XML::Twig newbie question
by Jenda (Abbot) on Sep 18, 2012 at 10:57 UTC

    Depends on the complexity of the subroutine. Maybe you do not want to include all that code in the middle of the loop. I would not sweat over the tiny difference in memory footprint or the cost of two additional subroutine calls. Use whatever makes the code easier to maintain.

    Enoch was right!
    Enjoy the last years of Rome.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://994219]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (2)
As of 2018-01-21 22:52 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    How did you see in the new year?

    Results (230 votes). Check out past polls.