Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Is there a more functional regex syntax?

by rjt (Deacon)
on Sep 18, 2012 at 15:54 UTC ( #994306=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Is there a more functional regex syntax?

I'm not exactly sure the expected output is for the cases where there is only one digit. I took a guess that the min = max in these cases, so if there is no second number, I use the first again.

s|^(\d+)(\-(\d+))?$|$total_min += $1; $total_max += $3//$1|e for (@r +anges);


Comment on Re: Is there a more functional regex syntax?
Download Code

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://994306]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others wandering the Monastery: (15)
As of 2015-07-28 16:34 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    The top three priorities of my open tasks are (in descending order of likelihood to be worked on) ...









    Results (258 votes), past polls