Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW

Re: Is there a more functional regex syntax?

by rjt (Deacon)
on Sep 18, 2012 at 15:54 UTC ( #994306=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Is there a more functional regex syntax?

I'm not exactly sure the expected output is for the cases where there is only one digit. I took a guess that the min = max in these cases, so if there is no second number, I use the first again.

s|^(\d+)(\-(\d+))?$|$total_min += $1; $total_max += $3//$1|e for (@r +anges);

Comment on Re: Is there a more functional regex syntax?
Download Code

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://994306]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (5)
As of 2015-04-01 03:33 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    When putting a smiley right before a closing parenthesis, do you:

    Results (678 votes), past polls