Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Do you know where your variables are?
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Is there a more functional regex syntax?

by smls (Friar)
on Sep 18, 2012 at 16:42 UTC ( #994311=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Is there a more functional regex syntax?
in thread Is there a more functional regex syntax?

Nice trick using the -1 index like that, I'll have to remember that...

Regarding the original question though, I was hoping for a solution that keeps the regexes, because even if replacing them with split is possible in this case, that won't always be feasible if dealing with more complex regexes.

  • Comment on Re^2: Is there a more functional regex syntax?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Is there a more functional regex syntax?
by tobyink (Abbot) on Sep 18, 2012 at 16:57 UTC

    Some regexes will work inside those parentheses.

    $totals[$_] += ($range =~ /(\d+)/g)[$_] for 0, -1;
    perl -E'sub Monkey::do{say$_,for@_,do{($monkey=[caller(0)]->[3])=~s{::}{ }and$monkey}}"Monkey say"->Monkey::do'

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://994311]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (2)
As of 2016-09-25 00:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Extraterrestrials haven't visited the Earth yet because:







    Results (462 votes). Check out past polls.