good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
Re^7: Perl 5 Optimizing Compiler, Part 7: Video Chat w/ Ingy & Reini, Today 9/18 8pm Central Timeby BrowserUk (Pope)
|on Sep 18, 2012 at 18:27 UTC||Need Help??|
You ask an expert for an opinion,
Nobody asked anyone's opinion in this thread. That didn't stop many self-proclaimed experts popping up to regurgitate their mostly second-hand expertise.
If you want to build a project on the opinion of uneducated amateurs,
Who are you calling uneducated? Who are you calling an amateur?
I suppose there's a chance you'll succeed.
Hedging your bets already.
Have you ever implemented a dynamic language like Perl?
Yes. I wrote my first basic interpreter in in 1972/73 -- were you born then? Or still in your diapers?. The first version ran like a dog; the second was a vast improvement.
And circa. 1987, a friend and I wrote a Small C interpreter. And used it to build an extended DOS shell -- also an interpreter.
I will believe that when I see it.
But if we followed your proscriptions, nobody would try and you would never see it.
With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.