Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: "double free or corruption" in Perl 5.16.0 but not in 5.14.2

by mje (Curate)
on Sep 20, 2012 at 18:05 UTC ( #994712=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: "double free or corruption" in Perl 5.16.0 but not in 5.14.2
in thread "double free or corruption" in Perl 5.16.0 but not in 5.14.2

Thanks. I just reported it with perlbug half an hour ago at https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=114984. I'll try your patch.


Comment on Re^2: "double free or corruption" in Perl 5.16.0 but not in 5.14.2
Re^3: "double free or corruption" in Perl 5.16.0 but not in 5.14.2
by mje (Curate) on Sep 20, 2012 at 18:38 UTC

    Unfortunately, patch applied against 5.17.4 gave the following test errors.

    ../cpan/CGI/t/tmpdir.t (Wstat +: 0 Tests: 9 Failed: 0) TODO passed: 3-9 ../ext/File-Glob/t/basic.t (Wstat +: 768 Test s: 49 Failed: 3) Failed tests: 19, 21-22 Non-zero exit status: 3 Files=2336, Tests=548419, 725 wallclock secs (50.53 usr 6.81 sys + 40 +1.23 cusr 34.93 csys = 493.50 CPU) Result: FAIL

    Perhaps I applied it incorrectly - will check.

      I'm pretty sure the patch was applied correctly to 5.17.4. I went back to stock 5.17.4 and all tests pass. With the patch the tests above fail.

      It's a bad patch. I'm not sure why I thought it passed with bleadperl (and I knew it didn't look right), but for whatever reason, it's a bad patch.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://994712]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (13)
As of 2014-12-18 16:46 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?





    Results (58 votes), past polls