in reply to
Re^2: Perl 5 Compiler, Again!
in thread Perl 5 Compiler, Again!
I agree that technically freezing the names of ops with 1.0 was a small problem. But the number was low and new names could be easily added.
There was never a public discussion about this policy change. Allison just went ahead and removed it, without any discussion. With my vehement disagreement, yes. But with no agreement from anybody else.
If PBC now is not sufficient after the third rewrite what is still missing? When even the tests are disabled, and the packfile examples do not work?