|
|
| Welcome to the Monastery | |
| PerlMonks |
Re^4: Perl 5 Compiler, Again!by chromatic (Archbishop) |
| on Sep 20, 2012 at 23:25 UTC ( #994781=note: print w/ replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
But the number was low and new names could be easily added. Agreed. Adding new ops is not a problem. Alphabetizing the oplist and renumbering the ops was unnecessary. There was never a public discussion about this policy change. I remember several public discussions, at least in multiple #ps meetings. If PBC now is not sufficient after the third rewrite what is still missing? The last time I looked at PBC, it was still too tightly coupled to the internal layouts of various PMCs, especially the Sub PMC.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||